This note was originally published on Barron’s.
Over the next several decades, human labor will be augmented then replaced by robots.
We already have robots that can see and hear. They can roughly process those inputs to define and “understand” what they see and hear. We have robots that can learn. Not in the same exact way as a human, but potentially in a far more scalable way for specific domains. We have robots that can manipulate objects in the real world, some already with speed and strength greater than any human.
If we agree on the above as our current and future state of automation, then we agree that robots will eventually be the most competitive option for the majority of what we call “work”. In a free market, that means robots should perform as much of the available work as possible, otherwise market resources will not be allocated with maximum efficiency. In other words, humans should not perform work that robots are capable of because it’s an inefficient use of resources. Therefore, detractors of long-term automation are detractors of free market capitalism. If you want the automated future to include human labor because you think humans need to work even if a robot can do it more efficiently, that’s socialism.
How will humans survive without income from jobs? Robots will create income for us. Money is just a store of value that can be traded for goods and services. Today, humans create value through work and receive money for their efforts which they then trade for survival and recreation. If robots are creating value through work in the future, and they don’t need money for survival or recreation (other than energy, maintenance, and replacement), then the incremental value they create after those costs can be transferred to society through a universal basic income. This is the most efficient way to transfer the benefits of automation to society while advancing the capitalist ideal. By providing no-strings-attached income to a society that no longer has traditional jobs, you allow individuals to choose how to spend their income, encouraging continued competition and innovation in the free market.
What do humans do in the future, if not work? How do we find purpose? We will focus on what separates us from robots: creativity, empathy, and community. In fact, the greatest human legacies are built on those pillars. Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, Leonardo Da Vinci, Shakespeare, the Dalai Lama. Can you name many people that spent their lives working at jobs that are more revered than names like those just listed? That have done more for society? Maybe Steve Jobs comes to mind, but he built a business on creativity first. Apple products are modern works of art at scale. Jobs was the artist behind it. Maybe Elon Musk comes to mind, but his guiding light is to save humanity — the ultimate act of empathy. Whether reducing carbon footprint, flying to Mars, or augmenting humans to compete with AI, his businesses are groups of people trying to save our species. Not everyone needs to find purpose on such a grand scale, but everyone will have the ability to in the future if they don’t need to worry about survival.
“Work” is much more than any job. It’s the value you create for yourself and others. For most of us, that means being a good parent, a good friend, a good neighbor. You won’t be remembered for that report you wrote or that deal you closed or that car you fixed. In the Automation Age, people will have more time to be creative, foster empathy, and build community — the things that have a truly lasting impact on society. Humans will still work in the automated future, but they won’t have jobs.
Disclaimer: We actively write about the themes in which we invest: artificial intelligence, robotics, virtual reality, and augmented reality. From time to time, we will write about companies that are in our portfolio. Content on this site including opinions on specific themes in technology, market estimates, and estimates and commentary regarding publicly traded or private companies is not intended for use in making investment decisions. We hold no obligation to update any of our projections. We express no warranties about any estimates or opinions we make.